Discover The Urantia Book \Papers\Advanced \Events Leading up to the Capernaum Crisis
After notable miracles, public expectations grew, but Jesus resisted being made a political leader. He focused instead on revealing the spiritual kingdom and preparing the apostles for rising opposition and misunderstanding.
Reading Level:

Paper 152 chronicles the pivotal events that precipitated the crisis in Jesus' ministry at Capernaum, marking the transition from his earlier period of public teaching and healing to the more spiritually focused final phase of his work. The narrative begins with Jesus' return to Capernaum following the healing of the Kheresa lunatic, where he performed two significant healings: the woman with a hemorrhage and the restoration of Jairus's daughter. These events further galvanized public attention while intensifying scrutiny from Jerusalem authorities who had dispatched observers to monitor his activities.
The watershed moment occurred with the feeding of five thousand people near Bethsaida-Julias, a deliberate miracle that inadvertently catalyzed a popular movement to proclaim Jesus king. His unequivocal rejection of this political aspiration shattered the materialistic expectations of many followers and initiated a clarification of his true mission. This episode represented the apex of his popular acclaim and the beginning of its decline, as Jesus deliberately shifted his focus toward preparing his core followers for the spiritual realities of the kingdom rather than continuing to accommodate the multitudes' desire for signs and wonders. The paper concludes with Jesus' brief visit to Jerusalem for Passover and his return to Capernaum for what would become his defining discourse in the synagogue, a sermon that would further polarize public opinion and force a decision among his followers.
Upon returning to Capernaum following the cure of the Kheresa lunatic, Jesus encountered a multitude eagerly awaiting him, their interest intensified by accounts of his recent healing work. Among those gathered were observers dispatched by the Jerusalem Sanhedrin, specifically tasked with finding grounds for Jesus' apprehension and conviction on charges of blasphemy or violation of Jewish law. This growing official scrutiny represented the institutional response to Jesus' expanding influence, adding a layer of political tension to his ministry.
As Jesus engaged with the assembled crowd, Jairus, a prominent synagogue official, approached him in desperation regarding his dying daughter. As they proceeded toward Jairus's home through the pressing crowd, Jesus suddenly halted, declaring that someone had deliberately touched him and drawn healing power from him. A woman who had suffered from a chronic hemorrhage for years came forward, acknowledging that she had touched his garment with the faith that such contact would cure her condition. Jesus compassionately addressed her as "daughter" and clarified that it was her faith, not the physical touch, that had effected her healing—an important distinction as Jesus consistently sought to elevate the spiritual dimensions of his work above the material manifestations that so captivated public attention.
As Jairus and Jesus approached the synagogue ruler's residence, they were met by a servant bearing the somber news that the child had already expired, suggesting there was no further need to trouble the Master. Undeterred, Jesus encouraged the grief-stricken father, saying, "Fear not; only believe," and proceeded into the house accompanied by Peter, James, and John. Confronted with the customary scene of professional mourners and family members engaged in ritualistic lamentation, Jesus declared that the girl was not dead but sleeping—a statement that elicited derision from those present who believed they could clearly distinguish between death and slumber.
After clearing the room of mourners, Jesus approached the child with her parents and the three apostles, took her by the hand, and commanded, "Daughter, I say to you, awake and arise!" The girl immediately rose and walked across the room, exhibiting complete recovery from her condition. Jesus then instructed that she be given nourishment, recognizing her physical need after prolonged illness. Later, Jesus explicitly explained to his apostles that the girl had been in a comatose state following extended fever, not truly dead, and that he had merely aroused her rather than resurrected her. Despite this rational explanation, his miracle-minded followers remained convinced they had witnessed a resurrection, illustrating the persistent challenge Jesus faced in conveying the true nature of his works to individuals predisposed to supernatural interpretation. This event typified how Jesus' ministry operated at the complex intersection of physical healing, spiritual insight, and the cultural expectations of his contemporaries.
The aftermath of this healing, alongside other incidents including the restoration of sight to two blind men, contributed to Jesus' reputation reaching its zenith, particularly as a healer. However, the narrative emphasizes that these events represented something unprecedented in universal history—the presence of a Creator Son embodying creative energy while manifesting unprecedented spiritual endowments that transcended material limitations. The unique convergence of faith from those seeking healing with the innate creative powers of Jesus, the incarnated Son of God, produced phenomena that could not be replicated or fully comprehended within conventional frameworks of understanding.
Following a period of intense activity in Capernaum, Jesus declared a brief furlough for his followers before their journey to Jerusalem for Passover. Seeking seclusion with the twelve, he departed by boat for a park south of Bethsaida-Julias on the eastern shore, a popular recreational area for Capernaum residents. However, observant onlookers noted their departure's direction and either secured boats or walked around the lake's northern shore to follow them. By late afternoon, more than a thousand people had located Jesus, and within three days, approximately five thousand men, women, and children had assembled.
This persistent multitude, many of whom had traveled considerable distances, remained with Jesus for three days despite dwindling food supplies. David Zebedee had established no encampment infrastructure, and Philip had made no provision for feeding such numbers. Meanwhile, a politically motivated contingent among the crowd, led by the evangelist Joab, began promoting the idea of proclaiming Jesus as king. This scheme found support among some apostles, particularly Peter, John, Simon Zelotes, and Judas Iscariot, who envisioned Jesus assuming leadership over a liberated Jewish state. Observing the developing situation Wednesday afternoon, Jesus conferred with James Alpheus, Andrew, and Philip about addressing the crowd's hunger. While Philip and Andrew advocated dismissing the people to seek food in surrounding villages, Jesus proposed directly feeding them.
When Andrew reported finding only five barley loaves and two dried fish in a boy's lunch, Jesus instructed the apostles to organize the multitude into groups of one hundred. Taking the meager provisions, Jesus gave thanks, broke the bread, and distributed it to his disciples for dispersal among the seated groups. Remarkably, all five thousand ate until satisfied, with twelve basketfuls of fragments collected afterward. This event is identified as the only nature miracle Jesus performed with conscious preplanning, wherein he employed his inherent ability to multiply food elements while bypassing normal temporal processes of creation. This extraordinary demonstration of power, rather than advancing spiritual understanding, inadvertently intensified materialistic expectations among the multitude, setting the stage for the crisis that would follow.
The miraculous feeding of the five thousand precipitated an immediate and transformative reaction among the assembled multitude. Having witnessed Jesus' ability to provide sustenance through supernatural means, the crowd rapidly connected this demonstration with their cultural expectations regarding the Messiah. Jewish tradition had long taught that when the true Messiah arrived, he would renew the miracle of manna in the wilderness, providing abundant food as Moses had done. Finding this expectation apparently fulfilled before their eyes, the people unanimously concluded that Jesus must be their long-awaited deliverer and rightful king.
This spontaneous popular movement gained momentum with infectious enthusiasm, particularly under the organizational influence of Joab and other politically-minded followers. In the perception of these simple Galileans, the capacity to feed multitudes naturally conferred the right to rule. The connection between material provision and political authority appeared self-evident to people conditioned by generations of messianic expectation focused on national restoration and material prosperity. As the fervor reached its crescendo, Jesus recognized the critical juncture at hand. Standing upon a large stone to command attention, he addressed the crowd with uncharacteristic directness, acknowledging their good intentions while firmly rebuking their materialistic focus: "My children, you mean well, but you are shortsighted and material-minded. How many times have I told you that my kingdom is not of this world?"
With resolute clarity, Jesus explained that they sought to make him king not from spiritual insight but from satisfied physical hunger. He emphatically redirected their attention to the Father in heaven as the true sovereign of the spiritual brotherhood he proclaimed, rather than any earthly ruler seated on a material throne. This decisive rejection of political messiahship shattered the expectations of many followers, who departed disillusioned. Most significant was the impact on his immediate disciples, particularly Peter, who had secretly harbored hopes of Jesus claiming his "rightful" position of leadership. The Master then withdrew to the hills for solitary communion with the Father, instructing Andrew to lead the bewildered apostles back to Zebedee's house. This pivotal moment of clarification would accelerate the polarization between those who could accept the spiritual nature of Jesus' mission and those who could not transcend materialistic expectations.
Following Jesus' unequivocal refusal of kingship and his withdrawal into the hills, the apostles departed by boat in a state of profound disillusionment. Their silence as they began rowing toward Bethsaida reflected their collective struggle to comprehend Jesus' rejection of what appeared to be the perfect opportunity to establish his authority publicly. This crisis of understanding most acutely affected Simon Peter, whose messianic expectations had been particularly vivid and whose disappointment consequently ran deepest. As they labored against contrary winds in growing darkness, Peter, exhausted both physically and emotionally, fell into a profound sleep in the boat's stern.
During his sleep, Peter experienced an extraordinarily vivid dream-vision in which Jesus approached their vessel walking upon the turbulent waters. In this dream state, Peter called out to the Master, who responded with reassurance: "Be of good cheer; it is I; be not afraid." Inspired by this apparent manifestation, Peter, still dreaming, requested permission to join Jesus on the water, only to become frightened by the waves and begin sinking, prompting Jesus to reach out and rescue him while gently reprimanding his lack of faith. So compelling was this subconscious experience that Peter physically rose during its culmination and stepped overboard into the actual lake, requiring immediate rescue by his fellow apostles.
The significance of this episode lies not merely in its psychological insight into Peter's state of mind during this period of crisis, but in how it subsequently became incorporated into the developing narrative of Jesus' ministry. Though recognized as a dream by more analytically minded contemporaries like the physician Luke (who consequently omitted it from his gospel account), Peter maintained throughout his life that this had been a literal encounter with Jesus. The incident illustrates how subjective experiences, particularly those aligning with desired religious interpretations, often superseded objective assessment in the formation of early Christian tradition. The persistence of this story as a "miracle" despite evidence of its visionary nature demonstrates how followers tended to interpret events through the lens of supernatural intervention, even when alternative explanations were readily available.
The following morning, Andrew discovered Jesus walking by the shore with young Mark, and the apostles reassembled at Zebedee's house. Jesus addressed the gathering with unprecedented directness, challenging their continued focus on material considerations despite months of spiritual instruction. He pointedly referenced scriptural passages about faith, patience, and trust, underscoring the inadequacy of their spiritual comprehension in light of recent events. His rhetorical question—"How long shall I bear with you?"—revealed his frustration with their persistent materialistic orientation despite extensive teaching about the spiritual nature of the kingdom.
Jesus proceeded to deconstruct the significance of the feeding miracle, explaining that it had failed to advance the spiritual kingdom precisely because it catered to material desires. Rather than inspiring spiritual hunger, the demonstration had reinforced expectations of continued material provision without corresponding spiritual development. He emphasized that their attempt to proclaim him king revealed how thoroughly they had misunderstood his mission, focusing on bread for physical sustenance rather than truth for spiritual nourishment. This misplaced emphasis had not only failed to advance the true kingdom but had actively hampered it by reinforcing exactly the materialistic expectations Jesus sought to transcend. The Master clarified that such spectacles ultimately served only to multiply enemies among religious leaders while failing to cultivate genuine spiritual transformation.
This sobering assessment concluded with Jesus announcing his intention to withdraw temporarily with the apostles before continuing to Jerusalem for Passover. He specifically forbade others from following, signaling a deliberate contraction of his public ministry and a shift toward more intensive preparation of his core followers. This retreat marked recognition that the expansive phase of his work, characterized by public teaching, training, and healing, had reached its natural conclusion. The feeding of the five thousand thus served as the demarcation point between this earlier period and the final year of his ministry, which would focus more exclusively on proclamation of the spiritual essence of the kingdom: divine sonship, spiritual liberty, and eternal salvation.
During their period of retreat at a wealthy believer's home in the Gennesaret region, Jesus conducted daily informal conferences with the twelve apostles. This solemn, subdued group of men was struggling to process the implications of recent events, finding themselves disoriented by the rapid shifts in public perception and the apparent contradiction between Jesus' extraordinary powers and his refusal to employ them toward establishing a visible kingdom. The narrative emphasizes that these former fishermen required time to reorient their fundamental conceptions about the Messiah's role, highlighting the difficulty humans experience in modifying deeply ingrained beliefs, particularly those reinforced by cultural and religious tradition.
To facilitate their understanding, Jesus employed the parable of the sower to illustrate the relationship between spiritual receptivity and effective transformation. He explained that appeals to human emotion, while useful for initially arresting attention, remained insufficient for producing lasting spiritual growth. Only by addressing the indwelling spirit through authentic truth could genuine and enduring character transformation occur. This represented a sophisticated psychological insight that emotional experiences might serve as the gateway to spiritual awareness, but could not substitute for the deeper engagement of the entire personality in spiritual reorientation. Jesus further cautioned that religious leaders in Jerusalem were actively conspiring with Herod Antipas to orchestrate his destruction, preparing the apostles for the intensifying opposition they would soon face.
The apostles were gradually awakening to several uncomfortable realities: that Jesus would not claim David's throne as they had anticipated; that spiritual truth could not be advanced through spectacular demonstrations; and that they faced a period of significant challenge rather than triumphant establishment of a political kingdom. While not yet fully comprehending the specific trials awaiting them in Jesus' final year of ministry, they were beginning the psychological and spiritual preparation necessary to navigate the coming crisis. This period of contemplative withdrawal allowed for the slow recalibration of expectations and the clarification of mission that would be essential for their continued effectiveness as ambassadors of the spiritual kingdom Jesus proclaimed.
Jesus and the twelve apostles journeyed to Jerusalem for Passover via an indirect route through Gerasa and Philadelphia, deliberately avoiding public attention. Jesus explicitly prohibited any public teaching during this period, reflecting his strategic shift away from broad public engagement toward focused preparation of his core followers. Upon reaching Bethany near Jerusalem on April 6, the group separated into smaller contingents for lodging, with Jesus and John staying at the home of a believer named Simon, while the other apostles were distributed throughout the community in groups of two.
During this Passover visit, Jesus entered Jerusalem only once, maintaining a deliberately low profile. This restraint stood in marked contrast to his previous public activities and reflected his awareness of the intensifying opposition from religious authorities. The apostles used this opportunity to gauge the extent of hostility developing against their Master in the religious capital, discovering that sentiment had indeed become increasingly bitter. This reconnaissance would prove valuable in preparing them for the conflicts that lay ahead as Jesus' ministry entered its final phase of public proclamation.
Upon departing Jerusalem on April 24, the group traveled along the coastal route through Joppa, Caesarea, and Ptolemais before turning inland to arrive at Bethsaida on April 29. Immediately upon returning, Jesus instructed Andrew to arrange permission for him to speak at the Capernaum synagogue the following afternoon. Jesus was fully cognizant that this would constitute his final opportunity to address this assembly, as he anticipated the formal rupture with religious authorities that would follow his forthcoming proclamation. This sermon would become the catalyst for the definitive crisis in his public ministry, forcing followers to decide between embracing the spiritual kingdom he proclaimed or adhering to traditional materialistic expectations of messianic deliverance.

Read the full Urantia Book paper using this link:
Paper 152 - Events Leading up to the Capernaum Crisis